Composite lessons from an Aussie master

The exceptional line-up of speakers at this year’s sold-out BACD Annual Conference included Dr Tony Rotondo. He travelled from as far away as Australia to share his many pearls of wisdom.

On the first day of the conference, he invited delegates to his hands-on workshop, where he showed clinicians how to restore the mesio-incisal third and create natural-looking composite veneers. The workshop began with an exploration into the theory of colour perception, with a focus on hue, chroma and value. He also discussed translucency and how it relates to dental composite materials.

“I learned something from an exceptional prosthodontist in the US,” Dr Rotondo said. “Imagine being in a plane and flying over an island. If you look out the window, you might see the shore line of the island as it meets the sea but as you look further out, the ocean appears a deeper blue and you can’t see the ocean floor. The deeper a swimmer goes under the surface of the sea, the deeper blue the ocean will appear. It’s the same concept with dentine and enamel.”

After presenting a case study – where he restored the mesio-incisal third of his son’s anterior tooth – Dr Rotondo detailed the steps involved with creating a silicone key for a wax-up model. He advised clinicians to try and minimise interference with the dam, visualise the palatal finish line on the silicone key, ensure proximal adaptation, and position the incisal finish line in the mid-incisor.

For the hands-on part of the workshop, delegates followed Dr Rotondo’s step-by-step instructions on creating a composite veneer by building up the material. The age of the patient will ultimately dictate the placement of the dentine on the tooth.

“I’m often fighting my natural instincts so that the restoration doesn’t look too regular,” he said. “I do have a tendency to seek out a bit of irregularity.” 

Dr Rotondo explained that after the dentine has been built up, this is the right time to use an abrasive or separating strip to create space between the teeth. He spoke about a German dental technician that described the process of applying dentine composite material as “gud, besser, scheisse”, emphasising that it is better to start off building up a little bit of composite and adding more when required. Otherwise, clinicians could end up with a poor, overworked result. Dr Rotondo then went on to show delegates how to trim, polish and contour the composite veneer with various different burs.

He said: “The hardest part of this process is the interproximal surfaces – trim all the way to the contact point but not beyond with a disc bur. The solution to avoid opening the contact point is to create separation between the teeth with wedges. I will then try to create valleys on the surface of the tooth rather than grooves with a speed-reducing handpiece – 95% of this will be polished out eventually. Having a flat incisal edge isn’t really what happens in nature, so I will also take a little bit of the material away if needed to ensure a natural-looking result.”

This highly engaging workshop concluded with Dr Rotondo showing delegates how he finishes off a composite veneer by applying peri-chromata to the tooth.

Commenting on her experience, Dr Harriet Morse said: “I thoroughly enjoyed my morning learning about composite veneer techniques with Tony – so many great tips to away and a very engaging speaker!”

“Great hands-on morning with Tony Rotondo,” said Dr Orestis Angeletos-Paparizos. “He was clear, informative and concise without any show-off.”

On the second day of the conference, Dr Rotondo shared his knowledge on the management of complex and interdisciplinary cases with direct resin. Reinforcing many of the ideas and concepts discussed during his workshop, he discussed the importance of facial analysis before planning for a composite restoration. He also explained that the first step of treatment is to determine the incisal edge position, the incisal plane, and tooth size/proportions in order to “create a vision for the case”.

Going through the step-by-step techniques he uses to build up composite restorations, Dr Rotondo discussed the idea of FOOC (Fear of opening the contact) and how clinicians are often afraid to open the contact point when contouring. Again, he advised practitioners to create space between the teeth with wedges.

During his lecture, Dr Rotondo also explained how making the teeth the right shape before orthodontics became his treatment philosophy for creating a common vision between the restorative dentist and the orthodontist. He demonstrated the value of following this philosophy to resolve the combined issue of space appropriate and altered tooth morphology in some cases. These include those requiring tooth substitution, as well as those involving micro-dontia, macro-dontia, or the loss of tooth volume due to attrition, abrasion and erosion.

Alongside Dr Mario Semenza on stage, Dr Rotondo brought the morning to a close with an engaging Q&A session, where delegates were able to engage in lively debate about the application of both direct and indirect restorations.

Dental student, Zain Rizvi, said: “I found Tony to be an engaging and interactive speaker. His tips and techniques about restoring incisal factures and doing composite veneers were very helpful and provided insight into his own methods.”

 

For further enquiries about the British Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, visit www.bacd.com

Dental implant placement in failed single-rooted vs. multi-rooted endodontic sites

There are multiple reasons why a patient may need a tooth extraction before dental implant placement. One of the most common is failed endodontic treatment. But is the number of roots at the failed endodontic site influential on the subsequent chance of survival for the dental implant?

 Emilie Baerts, a dental student studying at the University of Manchester, presented a session on this topic at the ADI Members’ National Forum alongside Dr Mansoor. Here she provides a summary of what they covered:

Patients often present with a tooth that needs extracting prior to dental implant placement. These teeth have commonly failed due to endodontic reasons. However, the literature is sparse about whether the number of root canals at a failed endodontic site affect implant success and survival. We decided to explore the available evidence and see whether there is a correlation.

 The endodontic evidence

Evidence from a prospective in vivo study of 1,100 endodontically failing teeth showed that 42% failed due to bacteria colonising missed canals.[i] This most often occurred in molar teeth with 2 or more roots where their canals were difficult to locate. Furthermore, additional research has shown that failure to locate the MB2 canal significantly decreases the long-term prognosis of molar teeth.[ii] It can therefore be assumed that teeth with more than one root may have a decreased endodontic success rate. Conversely, the canal in single rooted teeth is less likely to be missed during endodontic treatment, and therefore the procedure is likely to have a higher success rate.

Exploring implant failure

As some bacteria are inevitably left behind in the instance of tooth extraction, what we wanted to see was whether this impacted future dental implant survival rates. Some research has concluded that immediate implants can be placed in sites exhibiting a periodontal or periapical infection, provided they have been thoroughly debrided prior to dental implant placement.[iii] On the other hand, a further literature review suggested that ‘dental implants may fail to osseointegrate in sites of endodontic failure’.[iv] This is because any enterococcus faecalis, a gram-positive bacterium, left behind following endodontic failure could proceed coronally to the dental implant site, eventually causing a loss of osseous support and subsequent dental implant mobility.[v]

However, dental implant placement after waiting for post-extraction healing has also been associated with retrograde peri-implantitis. This may be the result of vegetative bacteria residing in the healed site moving coronally due to a lack of socket irrigation prior to healing. As such, it’s difficult to conclusively determine whether bacteria left behind from failed endodontic treatment does impact subsequent dental implant survival rates, and whether the number of roots in the tooth before extraction has any additional bearing on this. Effectively, we know that if there are more tooth canals there’s a higher risk of missing them during root canal treatment. We could deduce that the risk of complications may be higher in extraction sockets which have had missed canals during endodontics – but this is not conclusive. The literature is conflicting, and this can be difficult to decipher when professionals need to place a dental implant in a site where endodontic treatment has failed.

There’s also bone augmentation to consider, and this may influence results again, depending on the tooth site. Single vs. multi-rooted teeth with periapical pathology have different levels of apical bone resorption. Therefore, care needs to be taken when deciding the correct volume and type of bone graft to be placed, which will ultimately influence the success of dental implant surgery. The research we explored did not include information on whether bone grafting requirements differed depending on site, therefore this is an area of research that should definitely be investigated going forward.

The approach

In order to successfully evaluate all of the available evidence, a research question was used to identify the relevant studies. Our appraisal focused on ‘Adults ≥ 18 years who needed a titanium dental implant, immediate or delayed, in a failed endodontic site of 1 root and ≥ 2 roots.’ To identify studies, a systematic search of 5 databases was carried out. Selected articles were filtered to include English publications published between 2008 and 2018.

 

All of the studies we used had certain strengths and weaknesses. These were important to take into account when considering the evidence, especially as a number of the studies did not have enough evidence to offer much certainty on the topic.

As such, the biggest conclusion we can take from this is that more research is necessary. The studies that we used did offer some insight on the question, but ultimately, as they were not of a high enough quality, they were unable to shed any conclusive light on the matter. Hopefully this is something we will explore again going forward!

This session was just one of the many informative presentations which brought the stage to life at the ADI Members’ National Forum. So that you never miss out on being part of the discussion, join the Association of Dental Implantology today!

 

 For information on the ADI and other upcoming events, please visit www.adi.org.uk

 

[i] Hoen, M. M. & Pink, F. E. (2002). Contemporary endodontic retreatments: an analysis based on clinical treatment findings. J Endod. United States.

[ii] Tabassum, S. & Khan, F. R. (2016). Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur J Dent, 10(1), 144-7.

[iii] Waasdorp, J. A., Evian, C. I. & Mandracchia, M. (2010). Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. J Periodontol, 81(6), 801-8.

[iv] Flanagan, D. (2016). Implant Placement in Failed Endodontic Sites: A Review. J Oral Implantol, 42(2), 224-30. 9620191 Critically Appraised Topic 31

[v] Zhou, W., Han, C., Li, D., Li, Y., Song, Y. & Zhao, Y. (2009). Endodontic treatment of teeth induces retrograde peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. Denmark.

EasyReview: simple, fast, effective

EasyReview is the easy way to get more Google reviews – so sign up for your 1-month free trial today.

Real results from practices already using EasyReview:

  • Practice A in Poole went from 8 to 24 Google reviews in 2 weeks.
  • Practice B in Glasgow achieved 32 5-star Google reviews in 3 weeks.
  • Practice C in Leeds saw a 7% increase in Google reviews in just 24 hours!

EasyReview has been designed exclusively for dentists and links to your current practice management software. There is no contract, no minimum term.

Just more Google reviews, guaranteed!

Contact Dental Design to get your 1-month free trial of EasyReview.

 

Visit: www.easyreview.dental  or email: enquiries@dental-design.co.uk or tel: 01202 677277