The answer is always captured in the data

When I was a student at Birmingham dental school in the 70s we probably had access to the best dental public health academic education team in the country. The irony is that as a typical dental student of that time I was more interested in the technical and practical hands on work which I thought was what dentistry was all about.

I was oblivious to the significance of dental public health and that the most important tool in improving oral health was not the latest developments in materials and equipment (though as dental caries was far more prevalent then, and oral health much poorer, these were certainly important) but was epidemiology and data. It was many years before I was fully able to understand that accurate data and its interpretation should drive the development of all healthcare.

At the moment there appears to be a widespread difficulty in recruiting dental clinicians but if you look at the data then this should not be a surprise. In 2002 when the last comprehensive dental workforce review was published approximately 30 million people were seeing a dentist on a relatively regular basis whereas now it is approximately 36 million, in either the private or public sector, without growth and change in the workforce this is bound to put pressure on the system. The most recent review of the dental workforce published in 2013 recommended a 10% reduction in the number of dental students and an increase in the training of other members of the dental team. This remains the correct way forward as it reflects the changing needs of the population as a result of the improvement in overall oral health and the changing demographic.

Findings from the original Steele pilots and contract reform prototypes also suggest that there needs to be greater use of the whole dental team. There are indications that the use of a less rigid approach to currency application, either through contract reform or simply more use of the existing flexibilities might just be about to move forward, but without a larger dental care professional (DCP) workforce it is unlikely to be deliverable on a large scale.

Although the reduction in dental student numbers went ahead the number of (DCP) commissions has not, as yet, increased. Health Education England (HEE) has confirmed that the funding mechanism for DCP education has, like nursing and midwifery, changed since 2017 with student loans replacing NHS bursaries.

HEE have now commissioned yet another review of the dental workforce, Advancing Dental Care, which has now entered a second phase of “further research, stakeholder engagement, option analyses and piloting potential solutions” which they indicate, will take three years. At a time when there is already severe pressure on the dental workforce and initial findings from the evaluation of contract reform pilots indicated that a more diverse workforce was critical to their success, this seems a little like Nero fiddling while Rome burnt.

Fortunately other countries produce dental graduates in such numbers that their own economies cannot afford to support and many remain keen to move to the UK. This has always been the case, when I graduated in the mid seventies graduates of commonwealth countries had the right to registration in the UK and, as in other areas of healthcare, supported the delivery of NHS services. At the moment a significant number of EU countries overproduce dentists so unless the Brexit process goes really badly this is probably how the NHS will have to meet its statutory duty (included in the 2006 legislation) to provide or commission dental services. The main problem now seems to be that the processes in place to enable suitable clinicians to gain the all important NHS performer number are complex and much too time consuming. HEE seems to have recognized this and have indicated that they will work to improve the situation but it is taking an inordinate amount of time.

Change in the balance of dental education and the workforce in this country is absolutely the right thing to do but it is taking far too long.

East Sussex woman prosecuted for illegal tooth whitening

Hailsham woman, Katie Ensell, has been ordered to pay almost £3,500 by Hastings Magistrates’ Court after pleading guilty to offering illegal tooth whitening treatment through her business, KT’s Cosmetics, formerly Pearly Whites, Eastbourne.

Following the receipt of a complaint in March 2018, the General Dental Council (GDC) launched an investigation and on 18 July 2018, Ms Ensell held herself out to undercover GDC investigators as being prepared to practise dentistry, namely tooth whitening, using the Hollywood Whitening system.

Under the Dentists Act 1984 and following the High Court’s ruling in GDC v Jamous, the legal position in relation to tooth whitening is very clear. The treatment can only be performed by a dentist or a dental therapist, dental hygienist or a clinical dental technician working to the prescription of a dentist.

Katie Spears, Head of In-House Appeals and Criminal Enforcement at the GDC said: “Our primary purpose is to protect the public from harm. Illegal tooth whitening represents a real risk as those who carry it out are neither qualified to assess a patient’s suitability for the treatment, nor are they able to intervene should an emergency arise. When we receive a report of illegal practice, we seek to educate those involved about the dangers and the law in relation to tooth whitening. Where our efforts are ignored, as in the case of Ms Ensell, we will, where appropriate, prosecute in the criminal courts.”

Anyone considering tooth whitening should first check the register of dental professionals on the GDC’s website to ensure the individual offering the treatment is qualified to do so.

Endodontics and Sinus Issues – Mark Allen

Endodontic treatment is frequently used to save teeth that have become damaged due to decay or infection. As a means of combatting and eliminating infections of the root canal system, endodontic treatment is highly reliable with a success rate of around 90%.[i]However, sinus problems remain an unpleasant potential complication for patients.

To date, a truly comprehensive study of sinonasal complications arising from dental treatment has yet to be completed,[ii]but when a simple web search of a term like “root canal sinus problems” returns over 1.5 million pages we can see that this is at the very least a concern, if not a pressing issue for many patients.

Sinusitis is a swelling of the sinuses resulting from bacterial or fungal infections causing the sinus to no longer drain properly (there are other causes but these are not thought to be due to dental work). Symptoms can include excessive mucus, pain, tenderness, toothache and headaches. Without treatment sinusitis can become a chronic condition in some cases, and acute infections can be damaging (in rare instances resulting in severe consequences like blindness or a thrombosis forming in the sinus which can potentially break free).[iii]That this area can cause issues is unsurprising, as the roots of teeth are in very close proximity to sinuses, with only a thin layer separating the two. In some cases the roots even protrude into them.

There are several indicators of sinusitis that can quickly be discerned: the presence of nasal blockage and or discharge, tooth pain that is not localised to a single tooth, and using a light to gauge whether the mucosa is congested or swollen (allowing less light through making the area appear darker). Pain caused by sinus problems is also said to be more consistent and dull than that of other dental causes, which can vary from sudden sharp pain to protracted severe pain, or manifest as sensitivity to temperature. Once suspected, ultrasound, CT or MRI scans are very useful for diagnosis and evaluation.[iv]Treatment depends on the specific cause, in many cases antibiotic therapy is sufficient, but surgery can be required.

Some timeworn advice for patients in the days following the operation can also help to avoid sinus complications, namely to refrain from blowing their nose and if sneezing to not close their mouths. Of course, after a lifetime of sneezing as politely as possible, patients may find the latter in particular difficult not to lapse into.

The main risks for sinus issues arising from endodontic treatment itself are from misjudging the amount of obturation material required (over or underfilling), damage to the maxillary sinus or sinus mucosa through chemical or physical trauma during treatment, and the introduction of fungus, bacteria or foreign material into the sinus.

Filling materials can extrude during treatment into the sinus resulting in inflammation and potentially providing a vector for infection. In particular, root-filling materials containing zinc have been linked to promoting the growth of Aspergiollosis fumigates, resulting in fungal ball formation.[v]Even filling materials that are regarded as relatively bioinert may cause chronic sinusitis when overfilled.[vi]

A dental abscess describes the accumulation of pus in the alveolar bone at the root apex of the tooth. Dental abscesses can allow microorganisms to infest the root canals, resulting in the formation of biofilms. Left untreated these can lead to sinus issues and in serious cases septicaemia, shock and brain abscesses. Early diagnosis can unfortunately be frustrated due to the vagueness of early symptoms. Dental abscesses can be caused by, among other things, a failed root canal.[vii]While antibiotics are still the frontline treatment for bacterial infections of all sorts, antibiotic resistance is a growing threat and is expected to become an ever more serious threat in the foreseeable future.

While sinus problems arising from dental work can be successfully treated in the vast majority of cases once the irritant has been isolated,[viii]obviously it is in the interest of patients and practitioners to avoid this complication as much as possible. The biggest addressable factor here is accurate measurement; over and underfilling, and to some extent damage during treatment can be minimised or avoided entirely through precise measurement.

To assist with defining and confirming the working length, the CanalPro Apex Locator from COLTENE is highly recommended. Utilising electrical resistance to provide an excellent level of precision, the CanalPro Apex Locator is both highly accurate and easy to use. Providing audio feedback, you are free to verify canal length quickly and easily as often as required.

While no procedure is totally risk-free, with careful technique and guided by reliable tools you can help ensure your patients do not suffer from complications like sinusitis.

To find out more visit www.coltene.com, email info.uk@coltene.com or call  01444 235486

[i]Friedman S., Mor C. The success of endodontic therapy – healing and functionality. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2004; 32(6): 493-503. Available at http://www.endoexperience.com/documents/SuccessHealingFriedman.pdfAccessed August 9, 2018.

[ii]Felisati G., Chiapasco M., Lozza P., Saibene A., Pipolo C., Zaniboni M., Biglioli F., Borloni R. Sinonasal complications resulting from dental treatment: Outcome-oriented proposal of classification and surgical protocol. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 2013; 27(4): 101-106. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251877687_Sinonasal_complications_resulting_from_dental_treatment_Outcome-oriented_proposal_of_classification_and_surgical_protocolAccessed August 9, 2018.

[iii]Siqueira Jr. J. Microbiology and treatment of acute apical abscesses. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2013; 26(2): 255-273. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3623375/Accessed August 9, 2018.

[iv]Hauman C., Chandler N., Tong D. Endodontic implications of the maxillary sinus: a review. International Endodontic Journal. 2002; 35: 127-141. Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1046/j.0143-2885.2001.00524.xAccessed August 9, 2018.

[v]Park G., Kim H., Min J., Dhong H., Chung S. Endodontic treatment: a significant risk factor for the development of maxillary fungal ball. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology. 2010; 3(3): 136-140. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950265/Accessed August 9, 2018.

[vi]Kim J., Cho K., Park S.H., Park S.R., Lee S.S., Lee S.K. Chronic maxillary sinusitis caused by root canal overfilling of Calcipex II. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2014; 39(1): 63-67. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916508/Accessed August 9, 2018.

[vii]Prakash S., Prakash S.K. Dental abscess: a microbiological review. Dental Research Journal. 2013; 10(5): 585-591. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858730/Accessed August 9, 2018.

[viii]Felisati G., Chiapasco M., Lozza P., Saibene A., Pipolo C., Zaniboni M., Biglioli F., Borloni R. Sinonasal complications resulting from dental treatment: Outcome-oriented proposal of classification and surgical protocol. American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy. 2013; 27(4): 101-106. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251877687_Sinonasal_complications_resulting_from_dental_treatment_Outcome-oriented_proposal_of_classification_and_surgical_protocolAccessed August 9, 2018.

 

Should you be referring your radiographic reporting? Claus Oustrup

Reporting on radiographs precisely is necessary in order to provide the best patient care. However, if there’s one significant downside to this diagnostic process it’s that it can take time and extensive training to be able to do properly – something that is often difficult to commit to for busy professionals.

Although time consuming, it’s important that professionals adhere to guidelines, as otherwise this could open them up to litigation. But have you considered referring your radiograph reports to specialist radiologists? Doing so can have a number of benefits…

Guidelines within the EU

The standards for radiograph reporting are different throughout the world. Because of this it can be confusing for professionals to know exactly what needs to be reported on in order to protect themselves from legal liability as well as ensure that the patient receives care that is truly tailored to their needs. According to the European Society of Radiology (ESR) there is no universally accepted definition of what constitutes a good radiology report,[i]and both radiologists and those that receive the reports will often think differently about what the optimal content of a report may be.

Professionals will be aware through their training that such subjectivity exists, and therefore it is their obligation to record their radiology reports as accurately as possible. This is expected by both the GDC and professional indemnifiers, and is also a legal requirement within the UK.

EU law applies, as does the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations, and the Northern Ireland legislative requirements of IR(ME)R (NI) 2018, with Regulation 12(9) stating, “…ensure that a clinical evaluation of the outcome of each exposure… is recorded…”. Clinical evaluations represent an important part of the required quality assurance and clinical audit elements. Hospitals and community dental services have their own protocols, but for independent dentists Regulation 25 of the General Dental Services Regulations (Northern Ireland)also places a requirement that “A dentist shall keep a full, accurate and contemporaneous record in respect of the care and treatment given to each patient…”. This would include the recording of the clinical evaluation of a diagnostic test such as a radiograph.

However, it is universally agreed that a report must be accurate and portray information that is pertinent to developing the best possible care plan for the patient.

The speedy route

As previously mentioned, reporting on radiographs can take considerable time. Whilst this may not be a problem for professionals who only take one or two radiographs on a regular basis, for those who take a high volume of images the associated diagnostic administration can often require time that could be spent doing other things such as helping more patients.

Referring radiography reporting removes this pressure, as often radiology specialists will be able to return reports to you in a matter of days, freeing up the time you would otherwise have spent creating the report.

Protect yourself from legal action

In recent years, the way that professionals and patients think about the law has changed considerably. Lawsuits and complaints against GPs and dental professionals have risen sharply, with numbers rising by almost ten per cent from 82,559 in 2015/16 to 90,579 in 2016/17 alone.[ii]Due to this increase it’s little surprise that professionals are afraid of legal action being taken against them. Some reports even state that 90% of dentists now fear being sued, and that 94% of dentists feel like it’s now much easier to bring on a claim of clinical negligence than ever before.[iii]

This has further effects on dental professionals as 81% of respondents claimed that knowing these facts affects the way they provide care. This makes sense considering that 42% of respondents had had a legal claim filed against them and a further 66% of them knew a colleague who had been involved in legal action too.[iv]

Therefore, it makes sense to take any steps necessary to protect yourself from possible legal action. Referring radiographic reporting to a specialist helps to abate the chances of lawsuits as you will have received an expert opinion and are therefore more likely to be able to identify any abnormalities or problems that a patient should know about.

This provides a safety net, so that if the question of legal action does arise, you will have evidence to support that you did everything in your power to provide the best level of care.

 A streamlined solution

Referring to a specialist dental radiologist can have a number of benefits, however, finding a specialist can be easier said than done with less than 300 dental radiologists on a global basis.

Created to help dentists refer radiographic reporting with ease, PROPACS from Pro Diagnostics UK is a unique online cloud image storage system that also allows professionals to send radiographs to specialist dental radiologists for reporting. These reports take only 24 hours to turnaround and provide professionals with all of the information necessary to create the best possible care plan for the patient.

Ease the pressure

Taking radiographs is a necessary part of the diagnostic process, but that doesn’t mean that reporting on them needs to slow you down. By referring your radiographic reporting to a specialist you can save time, help safeguard yourself from legal action and receive highly detailed reports that will facilitate the creation of an effective care plan for the patient.

For more information, please visit www.prodentalradiology.com or email sales@prodiagnostics.co.uk

[i]European Society of Radiology. Good Practice for Radiological Reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging. 2011 Apr; 2(2): 93–96.

[ii]NHS Digital. Data on Written Complaints in the NHS, 2016-2017. Link: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/data-on-written-complaints-in-the-nhs/data-on-written-complaints-in-the-nhs-2016-17[Last accessed July 18].

[iii]  ALLMEDPRO. 90% of Dentists Now Fear Being Sued. Are you Sufficiently Protected? Link: https://www.allmedpro.co.uk/90-of-dentists-now-fear-being-sued-are-you-sufficiently-protected/ [Last accessed July 18].

[iv]Dental Protection. 91% of dentists believe they are more likely to be sued now than five years ago. Link: https://www.dentalprotection.org/uk/about/media-centre/press-releases-display/2015/03/13/91-of-dentists-believe-they-are-more-likely-to-be-sued-now-than-five-years-ago[Last accessed July 18].

 

Dental implants market projected to reach $5.9bn by 2028, says GlobalData

The global dental implants market is expected to reach $5.9bn by 2028, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 4.9% between 2018 and 2028, according to GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

The company’s latest report, ‘Dental Implant Devices, Global Outlook, 2015-2028’ reveals that Asia Pacific will be one of the fastest growing regions at a CAGR of 6.4% between 2018 and 2028, with North America and South America following closely behind at 4.5% and 4.9% respectively.

Market growth is fairly strong despite low global penetration of dental implants. In most countries, dental procedures are out-of-pocket expenses, but improved reimbursement policy has stimulated especially high growth in South Korea.

Sarah Janer, Medical Devices Analyst at GlobalData comments, “The titanium implant segment will continue to grow strongly due to the material’s biocompatibility, strength, versatility and cost. Zirconia implants will also show growth, but this will be limited by associated problems that limit durability and placeability.”

Barriers to market growth include a lack of dentists trained in implant procedures, and little to no reimbursement for implant procedures in many countries.

Janer concludes, “There is a large potential patient pool for dental implant procedures due to the high prevalence of periodontal disease in the global population. Growth in this market is due to the increasingly educated patient population that seek treatment, and the growth of emerging economies.”

Information based on GlobalData’s report: Dental Implant Devices, Global Market, 2015-2028

BDA: Review of RQIA ‘a welcome opportunity’

BDA Northern Ireland has reacted positively to a major review being undertaken of the Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority (RQIA), and the policy and legislation that underpins healthcare regulation by the Department of Health.

NIDPC Chair Richard Graham, and BDA NI Director, Tristen Kelso recently met with officials from DoH Quality, Regulation, Policy and Legislation Branch as part of a pre-consultation stakeholder meeting.

A DoH discussion paper produced as part of the Review acknowledges the existing, ‘uniform approach to registration and inspection’, developments in regulation policy, as well as existing ‘gaps’ mean a radical overhaul of the policy and legislation underpinning RQIA is necessary.

Richard Graham, NIDPC Chair commented:

“Being classified as ‘independent hospitals,’ and subject to annual inspections despite being considered ‘low risk’ – while we see 3 yearly inspection periods elsewhere – has perpetuated the feeling among GDPs for some time that the inspection regime is overly onerous, and not fit for purpose.

“We welcome the root-and-branch approach as proposed, not least the acceptance of moving to a ‘right-touch’ regulatory regime -and the acknowledgement of the issues associated with dental practices being classified as independent hospitals”.

BDA Northern Ireland has been calling for the 2003 Order to be reviewed for some time. An opportunity to engage with senior DoH officials was secured following representations made to the Permanent Secretary to reduce the frequency of dental inspections.

Following a review of ‘Fees and Frequency Regulations’ in 2017, a move from annual dental practice inspections to inspections every 2 years appears to be in the offing in the short-term, subject to sign-off by the Permanent Secretary. An opportunity to look at having this extended even further will be progressed under this latest review, which recognises the range of regulatory tools in improving quality and reducing risk, including professional regulation, quality assurance/reporting processes and use of data.

BDA NI Director, Tristen Kelso added:

“While this process is still at an early stage, we welcome the opportunity to engage with the Department of Health in shaping the future of regulatory policy, and the subsequent primary legislation that will follow on behalf of the profession. 

“The stated direction of travel by the Department is extremely encouraging. We intend to input fully into this process to ensure regulatory policy is much more closely aligned with the accepted low-risk nature of dental practices, and where the regulatory burden can be reduced by taking cognisance of regulation in the round”.

General Dental Council changes quality assurance for dentists’ education and training

In Shifting the balance, as part of an increased emphasis on upstream regulation designed to focus more on the prevention of harm to patients, the General Dental Council (GDC) made a commitment to develop a risk-based quality assurance process for dental education. Following a public consultation earlier this year, the regulator is now gradually introducing its proposals over the course of the current year, with full implementation due for completion before the start of the 2019/20 academic year.

The major change for education providers is that the frequency, duration, scope and depth of inspections will be determined by an assessment of risk, based on a range of factors including results drawn from new annual education provider self-assessments. The new risk-based system means that the frequency of visits from the GDC may increase, but it also means the duration of inspection is likely to decrease, to reflect the more focused and targeted nature of inspections.

A further major change is the introduction of thematic reviews which are to run in parallel to the risk-based approach to individual providers.

Manjula Das, Head of Education Policy and Quality Assurance at the GDC, said:

“The introduction of thematic reviews is designed to enable us to look at not only education programmes in individual institutions, but also at wider issues across the dental education sector. We heard compelling views about what the first theme should be. This led us to select new dentists’ ‘preparedness for practice’ as the area of investigation for our first thematic review – research is currently underway, and we will report on this at the end of 2019. This research will provide a robust evidence base to identify whether improvements are needed and, if so, what those might be, to ensure new graduates are fit and safe to practise.

“This is an interesting time for quality assurance in dental education and we are looking forward to working closely with our partners as we implement and learn from this new approach, which will inform our future developments in this important area.”

The GDC’s response to views submitted during the consultation phase and further details of the changes can be found in Education processes: consultation outcome report.

 

Okayama University research: Insights into mechanisms governing the resistance to the anti-cancer medication cetuximab

Researchers at Okayama University report in the Journal of Periodontology that the presence of commensal flora in the mouth may play a key role in the functioning of the immune system against periodontal infections.

The development of an animal’s immune system relies on commensal flora — microorganisms such as bacteria present in certain parts of the body.  In the case of immunity against periodontal diseases — infections of the areas surrounding teeth — it is unclear, however, what exactly the role of commensal flora is.  Now, Professor Manabu Morita from Okayama University and colleagues have investigated the relation between commensal flora in the mouth and the immune response to a bacterium called Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), which contains lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a known periodontal pathogen.

The researchers tested the immune response of mice after the application of P. gingivalis/LPS.  Two types of mouse were used in the experiments: germ-free and specific-pathogen-free mice.  The former are free of any microorganisms, including commensal flora; the latter are mice guaranteed to be free of certain pathogens — in this case, periodontal pathogens — but not of commensal flora.

The response to the bacterium was assessed by the amounts of particular types of cells that are characteristic of immune system activation.  Four groups of mice were monitored: a ‘baseline’ group not exposed to P. gingivalis and three groups to which the bacterium was applied; each of the three groups was then examined at different points in time after the application of LPS.

The scientists observed that exposure to P. gingivalis led to an increase in the number of a certain type of cell associated with immune system activity in the specific-pathogen-free mice, after 3 hours, indicating that application of the bacterium indeed triggered the immune system.  At the same time, the germ-free mice did not show similar increased levels of these cells, suggesting that commensal flora contribute to the development and functioning of the periodontal immune system.

Professor Morita and colleagues are aware of the limitations of their study.  They did not, for example, investigate the effect of repeatedly applying LPS.  They also acknowledge that only a limited set of cell types characteristic of immune system activity was monitored.  Therefore, the scientists concluded that “[the] results, though suggestive, should be interpreted with caution.”

Practice acquisitions: How has the independent buyer changed?

Leah Turner, Practice Sales Director of Dental Elite considers independent buyers’ purchasing habits…

Practice acquisitions: How has the independent buyer changed?

As you know, the dental practice sales and acquisitions market is constantly evolving, which can affect everything from dentists’ ability to buy and sell, to the practice asking price. But it’s not just trends that change; so do the buyers. Independent buyers in particular have changed somewhat over the years, in that the overall knowledge of buyers on the purchasing process and market trends has improved drastically.

Whereas before dentists might have been unsure about what buying a practice entailed, it is now the case that more dentists are aware of what is involved; especially in regards to how to model a practice themselves and how aspects of the transaction – such as the valuation – theoretically work. This is due, in part, to the amount of information that is now available via different mediums and an increase in being business savvy. But there’s also an element of necessity, as expectations from banks are far greater than a decade ago. Buyers have to not only be able to prove that their chosen practice is viable, but that they’re capable of running and growing a business. It’s no longer enough to just have the clinical skills.

We’ve also noticed that an increasing amount of dentists are less reliant on advisers; at least in regard to identifying whether a practice is a good business venture or not. This is a good thing, as it means that buyers are less likely to make bad investment decisions – not necessarily from a financial perspective, as banks don’t tend to lend against a failing or non-profitable business – but in regard to time and effort. This means that dentists are able to search more efficiently and find a more suitable practice fit for their needs.

In regard to the plans that buyers have, there’s been a real resurgence over the last few years in private practice acquisitions. Of course, there’s still strong interest in NHS practices and we are continuing to see dentists follow the pattern of: qualify, complete foundation training, and work for a couple of years as an associate before buying their first practice. A number of these dentists invariably go on to acquire additional practices and build what is essentially a small group, most likely with the intention of reducing their presence in the practice over the course of time.

But alongside this, there has been a notable rise in the number of dentists looking to enter into private practice, who tend to go down the route of further education after working for several years as an associate. This has grown from the fact that because there are more and more dentists offering specialist treatments due to greater postgraduate training opportunities, not all specialists are able to feasibly offer their services as associates. These dentists are therefore seeking alternative options – that is, buying a private practice that they can work in and grow themselves.

Due to the time it takes to secure the right qualifications and financial wherewithal, these buyers tend to be a bit older. This is also the case where goodwill values are higher, though you do see younger buyers if they have the support of family money. Where the buyer is younger or more entrepreneurial, we have seen a growing interest in buying under new structures that means they don’t own 100% of the practice. Not only can this be beneficial for the buyer in terms of easing some of the financial burden and providing business and clinical support, but it can also be extremely advantageous to the existing principal looking to decrease their involvement in the practice.

In light of all this, it is important to remember that trends (including those pertaining to lending) can change very quickly, meaning that the current pool of independent buyers could well be different in the future to what it is now. The market too can evolve rapidly, which can make it extremely difficult to navigate through the transaction – regardless of prior knowledge and understanding. Indeed, no matter how clued up you are, there are certain aspects of the process that are best dealt with by a specialist sales and acquisitions agency like Dental Elite. Plus, going at it alone, you can’t guarantee that what you’re getting is the best deal in the long-term. As for the vendor, staying up to date with current market trends and having an awareness of what the buyer pool looks like is essential to ensuring a successful sale. Only by seeking professional help can one hope to stay ahead of the game.

For more information on Dental Elite visit www.dentalelite.co.uk, email info@dentalelite.co.uk or call 01788 545 900

41 Years… and still investing – My Journey

Manchester-renowned dentist, ANDY MICHALCEWICZ has been in the dentistry industry for more than four decades. Here he talks to The Probe about his journey to finding the perfect location for his new practice, using the power of persuasion to secure the premises and how careful planning went in to refurbishing Ash Villa.

A warmer, friendlier dentist you could not wish to meet. With almost 41 years in dentistry under his belt, Andy Michalcewicz is perhaps one of the longest qualified, still practising, dentists in the Manchester area. With his career continuing to flourish, Andy reminisces about how he landed in dentistry, a chance meeting with an old friend that led to his first practice purchase and the latest chapter in the development of the practice.

“I made the decision to go into dentistry when I was 8 or 9 years old. After a few bad experiences with the dentist I thought to myself, “I could do a better job.” I gained the results I required at school and found I was good with my hands through a love of model building and playing musical instruments. Encouraged by my mother, who was the senior theatre nursing officer at Wythenshawe Hospital and responsible for running 20+ operating theatres, I studied dentistry at Sheffield University and after completing my training, became an Associate at a practice in Stockport.

“I used to meet a dentist friend for a pint every Wednesday. One week, while we were chatting, another old friend arrived by chance, someone I hadn’t seen for over 15 years. It was a fabulous reunion and we had a great evening catching up on everyone’s news. During the course of the evening my friend happened to mention that his future father-in-law, also a dentist, was in the process of selling his dental practice. Since this dentist and practice had an excellent reputation, I was intrigued.

“The sale was almost complete but my friend’s future father-in-law wasn’t happy with the T&C’s and it didn’t seem certain that the sale would come to a satisfactory conclusion. It was probably an ‘off the cuff’ remark at the time but I asked my friend to get his father-in-law to call me if the sale fell through. It was a few weeks later when I got a surprise call to say the sale was off and was I interested. To cut a long story short, I became the proud owner on 1st April 1981.”

Andy’s new practice was an end terrace building, on Washday Road, Sale, next to Mecca Bingo. His business thrived there for 19 years before Andy took the decision to relocate a mile away to a larger property. He explains, “We just could not accommodate our growing patient base so I started to look around for suitable new premises and found a detached residential property that seemed perfect for conversion to a dental practice. The downside was that it was already being pursued by a physiotherapy business, but the sale was proceeding slowly. With some persuasion, I managed to get the owner to agree they would sell to whoever could be ready to exchange contracts first. Needless to say, we were successful and opened Ash Villa in January 2000.”

The new property gave Andy’s practice the room it needed to expand. Moving all the equipment from the Washway Road property, they kitted out two surgeries, and in 2003, opened a third surgery upstairs in the former front bedroom.

Fast forward 14 years to 2017 and prompted by the departure of his long serving hygienist, Andy started to think about bringing the third surgery up to date. With Brooke, the new therapist/hygienist on board, he set about planning a modern new room they could share.

The starting place for their planning was the Belmont showroom at Salford Quays. Andy explains, “I had been tempted to install a Belmont chair 15 years ago but at the time was persuaded to install another brand. This time I decided I would take another look, as many of my dentist colleagues and service engineers recommended them highly.

“At the showroom Mark Harris patiently took us through all the options. We settled on the compact Compass electric model with two micro-motors and the 5-to-1 speed increasing hand piece, as I really like the control and torque. Both Brooke and I felt the delivery system would work well and the ergonomic design makes it easy for the patient to access extremely comfortably. I particularly liked the LED operating light too.

“We contacted Simon Pearce at McKillops for help with the refurbishment work. Simon came over to the practice and one evening, together with Brooke, we planned out the room layout plus a new decontamination room under the stairs and made our wish list for the kit and equipment we wanted.”

Starting work in April the refurbishment project took just three weeks to complete, which included rewiring the first-floor electrics and all the plastering, plumbing, flooring, decorating and installation of the new equipment, cabinetry and chair.

The service delivered by McKillops impressed Andy, “They’ve been a fantastic bunch of people to work with. Clearly Simon has lots of experience and is able to anticipate potential problems and work them out. Throughout, he liaised closely with Julie, my Practice Manager, to ensure dates were co-ordinated and she is extremely complimentary about the professionalism of the whole team.

“Due to Simon’s careful planning we were able to keep the practice open with very little disruption to the patients, which as everyone knows, is vital in the dental world. I’m really thrilled with how it has turned out and the patients love it too.”

Andy has absolutely no regrets. “The plan now is to celebrate the official opening of the new room with all my great team and, of course, the McKillop team. I’m sure they’ll be a ribbon cutting and a glass or two of fizz for all too.”